<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keyword Effectiveness Index (KEI) with Google Keyword Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maverickwebcreations.com/2009/07/25/keyword-effectiveness-index-kei-google-keyword-data.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maverickwebcreations.com/2009/07/25/keyword-effectiveness-index-kei-google-keyword-data.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:49:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince Law</title>
		<link>http://www.maverickwebcreations.com/2009/07/25/keyword-effectiveness-index-kei-google-keyword-data.html/comment-page-1#comment-5570</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maverickwebcreations.com/?p=655#comment-5570</guid>
		<description>Hi Dylan,
If I were to do a search to see who my real competitors are, I would now use phrase matching for both Google.com and Google AdWords. A lot of web sites have very poor SEO, so using broad matching won&#039;t return all the competitors I should beat.
Please note that exact matching on Google.com is actually &quot;phrase matching&quot;. I don&#039;t use exact matching for Google AdWords any more.
An even better way to find your best competitors would be to use the allintitle operator in Google.com.
Here&#039;s an example of the keyword phrase, &quot;WordPress Help&quot;, which is the main keyword I am targeting on my home page.
http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;site=webhp&amp;source=hp&amp;q=allintitle:%22wordpress+help%22&amp;btnG=Google+Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=allintitle:%22wordpress+help%22&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;psj=1&amp;fp=267856ed3ee60de5
You could also try the allinanchor operator...
http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;site=webhp&amp;q=allinanchor:%22wordpress+help%22&amp;btnG=Google+Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;psj=1&amp;fp=267856ed3ee60de5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dylan,</p>
<p>If I were to do a search to see who my real competitors are, I would now use phrase matching for both Google.com and Google AdWords. A lot of web sites have very poor SEO, so using broad matching won&#8217;t return all the competitors I should beat.</p>
<p>Please note that exact matching on Google.com is actually &#8220;phrase matching&#8221;. I don&#8217;t use exact matching for Google AdWords any more.</p>
<p>An even better way to find your best competitors would be to use the allintitle operator in Google.com.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an example of the keyword phrase, &#8220;WordPress Help&#8221;, which is the main keyword I am targeting on my home page.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#sclient=psy&#038;hl=en&#038;site=webhp&#038;source=hp&#038;q=allintitle:%22wordpress+help%22&#038;btnG=Google+Search&#038;aq=f&#038;aqi=&#038;aql=&#038;oq=allintitle:%22wordpress+help%22&#038;gs_rfai=&#038;psj=1&#038;fp=267856ed3ee60de5" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#sclient=psy&#038;hl=en&#038;site=webhp&#038;source=hp&#038;q=allintitle:%22wordpress+help%22&#038;btnG=Google+Search&#038;aq=f&#038;aqi=&#038;aql=&#038;oq=allintitle:%22wordpress+help%22&#038;gs_rfai=&#038;psj=1&#038;fp=267856ed3ee60de5</a></p>
<p>You could also try the allinanchor operator&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#sclient=psy&#038;hl=en&#038;site=webhp&#038;q=allinanchor:%22wordpress+help%22&#038;btnG=Google+Search&#038;aq=f&#038;aqi=&#038;aql=&#038;oq=&#038;gs_rfai=&#038;psj=1&#038;fp=267856ed3ee60de5" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#sclient=psy&#038;hl=en&#038;site=webhp&#038;q=allinanchor:%22wordpress+help%22&#038;btnG=Google+Search&#038;aq=f&#038;aqi=&#038;aql=&#038;oq=&#038;gs_rfai=&#038;psj=1&#038;fp=267856ed3ee60de5</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://www.maverickwebcreations.com/2009/07/25/keyword-effectiveness-index-kei-google-keyword-data.html/comment-page-1#comment-4763</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 02:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maverickwebcreations.com/?p=655#comment-4763</guid>
		<description>Great post. Thanks for breaking down the KEI for Google data. I just have one question - why did you decide to query the Adwords tool, and search Google.com for exact match opposed to broad match?
Google is a semantic search engine therefore it would seem most relevant to run your Adwords search volume queries without [exact match] , and to query Google.com for competitors without &quot;quotes&quot; for target keywords.
If I&#039;m positioning my site for the keyword &quot;online music service&quot; I don&#039;t really care what order the keywords are in, nor do I care if Google semantically relates keywords such as &quot;internet music service&quot; or &quot;online music company&quot;. As such wouldn&#039;t it be best to elminate exact match when looking for search volume and competitors on Google?
Thanks!
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. Thanks for breaking down the KEI for Google data. I just have one question &#8211; why did you decide to query the Adwords tool, and search Google.com for exact match opposed to broad match?</p>
<p>Google is a semantic search engine therefore it would seem most relevant to run your Adwords search volume queries without [exact match] , and to query Google.com for competitors without &#8220;quotes&#8221; for target keywords.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m positioning my site for the keyword &#8220;online music service&#8221; I don&#8217;t really care what order the keywords are in, nor do I care if Google semantically relates keywords such as &#8220;internet music service&#8221; or &#8220;online music company&#8221;. As such wouldn&#8217;t it be best to elminate exact match when looking for search volume and competitors on Google?</p>
<p>Thanks!  </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.maverickwebcreations.com/2009/07/25/keyword-effectiveness-index-kei-google-keyword-data.html/comment-page-1#comment-2016</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 11:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maverickwebcreations.com/?p=655#comment-2016</guid>
		<description>I use KEI when doing research, but you have to realize that the absolute values are not very important. The KEI of a keyword only matters in comparison to other keywords derived in the same manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use KEI when doing research, but you have to realize that the absolute values are not very important. The KEI of a keyword only matters in comparison to other keywords derived in the same manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron @ Fitness Training Programs</title>
		<link>http://www.maverickwebcreations.com/2009/07/25/keyword-effectiveness-index-kei-google-keyword-data.html/comment-page-1#comment-2008</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron @ Fitness Training Programs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maverickwebcreations.com/?p=655#comment-2008</guid>
		<description>What a great post.  Sometimes it&#039;s beneficial to understand the algorithm behind a program such as KEI.  Great information here.  I&#039;ll be using more of KEI in the near future.  Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great post.  Sometimes it&#8217;s beneficial to understand the algorithm behind a program such as KEI.  Great information here.  I&#8217;ll be using more of KEI in the near future.  Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David @Website Hosting</title>
		<link>http://www.maverickwebcreations.com/2009/07/25/keyword-effectiveness-index-kei-google-keyword-data.html/comment-page-1#comment-1968</link>
		<dc:creator>David @Website Hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 11:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maverickwebcreations.com/?p=655#comment-1968</guid>
		<description>Whow - This was the first blog post I&#039;ve come across where somebody tries to explain the math behind KEI. Very good - I&#039;ll try to apply KEI more to my keyword research! Thanks! David :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whow &#8211; This was the first blog post I&#8217;ve come across where somebody tries to explain the math behind KEI. Very good &#8211; I&#8217;ll try to apply KEI more to my keyword research! Thanks! David <img src='http://www.maverickwebcreations.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VNOHosting &#187; Keyword Effectiveness Index (KEI) with Google Keyword Data &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.maverickwebcreations.com/2009/07/25/keyword-effectiveness-index-kei-google-keyword-data.html/comment-page-1#comment-1934</link>
		<dc:creator>VNOHosting &#187; Keyword Effectiveness Index (KEI) with Google Keyword Data &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maverickwebcreations.com/?p=655#comment-1934</guid>
		<description>[...] rest is here:  Keyword Effectiveness Index (KEI) with Google Keyword Data &#8230;   This entry is filed under Email, Search Engine Placement. You can follow any responses to this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rest is here:  Keyword Effectiveness Index (KEI) with Google Keyword Data &#8230;   This entry is filed under Email, Search Engine Placement. You can follow any responses to this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

